top of page

Geometry

Some thoughts

On definitions - Do definitions utilized in geometry "work" in any dimension? Is it OK if they don't? What do teachers, especially in the K-12 grade levels, need to know to create or use more universally applicable definitions?

 

Here is an example: When students are initially taught about parallel lines, they are defined as lines which never touch. This definition works in two-dimensions but does not work for three or higher dimensions. Lines that are skew in three-dimensions do not touch but are not parallel.  A better definition would be parallel lines are always equidistant from each other. ​

 

This allows wonderful questions such as: 

  - Can curved lines be parallel?

  - Can shapes be parallel? If so, which ones?

  - What would parallel look like in the 4th or 5th dimension?

What are other examples of definitions or "rules" which only work for one part of the math world?

bottom of page